ShillScoreMy account ↗
Receipts over reputation

Influence is loud.
The record
speaks louder.

Crypto influencer calls, measured. Look beyond the follower count. Compare recorded outcomes and inspect the sources behind every score.

CALL COVERAGESolanaRobinhood ChainBase
Explore the leaderboard ↗
Wins. Losses. The full recorded picture.
THE SHILLSCORE RECEIPTFictional demo
ShillScore receipt markRECORD / 001
RECORDED EXAMPLEFIXED 7D WINDOW
OA
Onchain Atlas
@atlas_demo · fictional profile
84 /100
90.0%
+56.5%
10 calls · 9 wins · 1 lossSeparate calls, not a portfolio
Good calls. Bad calls. Both count.BUILT FOR THE RECORD
Fictional demo influencers
Inspectable example records
7 daysSame window for every call
Sources firstManual evidence review
LESS HYPE. MORE CONTEXT.

The record. Ranked.

A score is the starting point. Open a profile to inspect the calls behind it.

RANKINFLUENCERSHILLSCOREWIN RATEAVG. 7D RETURNCALLSRECORD

Demo only: all names, tokens, returns, and records are fictional. Small samples are marked provisional. Returns exclude trading fees and slippage; a score does not establish honesty or predict future returns.

A REPUTATION SHOULD COME WITH RECEIPTS

From the call to the record.

01 / THE SOURCE

Find the original call.

Record the post, token contract, and timestamp. Keep the original source attached so people can inspect the context.

02 / THE MEASUREMENT

Use the same window.

Compare reference entry and seven-day prices. Show the measurement sources and retain the limits of those estimates.

03 / THE FULL PICTURE

Keep the losses visible.

Publish reviewed outcomes with the sample size and coverage. Corrections stay in the record instead of disappearing.

TRANSPARENCY BY DESIGN

The methodology is part of the product.

Fixed measurement windows, visible losses, and a published formula keep the record understandable. Small samples stay provisional.

ON THE ROADMAP / $SHILL

Build the signal first.

Watchlists, in-app updates, and reports are available. $SHILL has not launched; paid analytics and holder-only access remain on the roadmap.

A following isn't a track record.

Inspect the calls. Compare the outcomes. Keep the receipts.

Explore call receipts ↗
Open methodology · v0.1

How the score is calculated

This prototype uses fictional records to demonstrate a reproducible scoring system. The demo contains no real influencer evaluations. The curator-reviewed view uses manually entered local records and is not independently verified.

1. One consistent window

A win is a strictly positive return seven days after a call. Zero returns count as non-wins. Average return is the arithmetic mean of all seven-day returns, including losses.

2. An inspectable formula

Score = round(70 × win rate + 30 × return component). Win rate is a fraction from 0 to 1. The return component is clamp((average percentage return + 50) / 150, 0, 1). Scores range from 0 to 100. Profiles with fewer than eight calls are provisional.

3. Evidence before publication

Real records will need the original post URL, token contract and chain, UTC call timestamp, price source, reference entry price, seven-day exit price, liquidity checks, and disclosure status. This demo intentionally provides no fabricated post links.

4. Limits and corrections

The demo formula does not yet account for drawdown, market benchmarks, liquidity, fees, slippage, or survivorship bias. Real scores use a declared fixed 90-day pilot and one call per influencer/token per seven-day episode. Historical case studies remain separate. Read the tracking and coverage rules. Paid placement must never alter a score.